Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may Individual Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place regarding attachment from inside the people mating. Report about Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A beneficial. (2002). Sites paradox revisited. Record regarding Social Items, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social technical one to minimizes public involvement and psychological well-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Number, time, and you can duration of marriages and you will divorces. Most recent Society Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies from closeness, hobbies, and commitment: Analysis the brand new presumptions of your triangular theory from like. Mental Records, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Effect finest throughout the creating tough: Personal reviews inside personal matchmaking. Record away from Character and Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge from close rivalry. Log away from Identity and you can Public Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A good. (2001)mitment and you will dating restoration elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you glamorous possibilities: The fresh changed mindset away from matchmaking restoration. Development and you will People Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential research out of disagreement and you may accord inside the upset and you will nondistressed marital lovers. Record out-of Contacting and you will Health-related Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Environmentally friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship formation online: What is the larger destination? Record regarding Public Affairs, 58(1), 9–31 Amour Factory dato.
The great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization while the construction out-of pleasure inside the intimate matchmaking
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison objectives during the close matchmaking: A style of around the globe improvement and you will specific verification. Inside P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents on the examination of partners communication (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor thread from contact lens out-of accessory idea. Psychotherapy: Concept, Lookup, Practice, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh new social keeping track of program: Improved susceptibility so you’re able to societal signs as a transformative reaction to societal exemption. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest societal outcast: Ostracism, personal different, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Push.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Worldwide and you will particular relational habits on the connection with societal relations. Record of Identification and you can Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can suggestions trying in personal dating. Identity and you will Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will particular connection representations inside adulthood: Is there a romance?. Record Out of Personal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate intimate matchmaking: Repairs and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection really impression certainly one of spouses because the a purpose of the newest resemblance inside their mutual experiences. Character And Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Results of salience regarding extrinsic perks for the liking and loving. Log from Character and you can Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.