The first design got a negative match (CFI = 0
The outcome out-of joy to the initial relationship try slightly large to own mothers (b = 0
In the next step, pleasure on T1 (before maternity) was as part of the model because the a predictor of one’s intercepts and you will mountains off union (find Desk step 3). The fresh design boasts the effect of the individuals delight towards the their particular union (actor feeling) therefore the effect on their partner’s partnership (spouse impression) of fathers and mothers and you can childless group. To check on all of our theory, we looked at the fresh new predictive negative effects of star and you can spouse happiness toward changes in relationship over the change in order to parenthood to possess moms and dads and you can compared these to childless people (we.e., the result away from glee towards the hills).
The past model had a fair match, CFI =0
946, TLI = 0.931, RMSEA = 0.065 (90% CI = 0.033, 0.091). 964, TLI =0.961, RMSEA = 0.049 (90% CI = 0.000, 0.076). The actor effects of happiness on the intercepts showed that, as predicted, more reported happiness at T1 predicted higher average levels of commitment at T1 for fathers (unstandardized b = 0.13, p < 0.001; see Table 3 for standard error SE and standardized ?). Model fit improved when this effect was constrained to be equal for childless men (b = 0.13, p < 0.001), indicating that the effect did not differ between fathers and childless men. 25, p < 0.001) and not significant for childless women (b = 0.02, p = 0.69). The partner effects on the intercepts were not significant, showing that the partner's happiness at T1 did not predict the average level of commitment at T1 for parents and childless men and women (b = 0.01, SE = 0.02, ? = 0.06, p = 0.66).
The consequences regarding pleasure with the hills indicated that fathers’ own pre-maternity happiness predict their change in relationship over time. (далее…)