Study have been analysed playing with SPSS twenty-five.0. First descriptive analyses was performed, also Cronbach’s alphas and wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate connections ranging from gender, years, sexual orientation, that have an intimate/intimate spouse, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you can desire to take part in sexting as the separate variables, additionally the four sexting habits while the situated parameters. Nagelkerke’s R dos was considered as a measure of effect dimensions. All of the variables have been registered to the model as well. The study has also been stratified by the sex.
Prevalence off sexting habits
The most prevalent sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and obtaining through an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), followed by third-cluster forwarding of sexual blogs (nine.3%) and you may, finally, sending (8.1%). Detailed statistics receive in the Desk 2.
The fresh regression models was indeed significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are .42 toward “sending” model, .30 into the “receiving” model, .23 to your “third-group forwarding” model, and .17 for the “getting via a mediator” design (Desk 3:
Regarding the “sending” design, desire to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust interval [CI]: 5.36-), that have an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-2.93), sexual positioning (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step three.00) and you can many years (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.14-1.63) was basically somewhat pertaining to giving engagement. On the “receiving” design, which have an intimate/sexual mate (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), readiness so you can sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step 3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-1.86) and you may many years (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-step one.41) was basically rather associated with researching involvement.
On “third-people forwarding” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.1six-six.51), readiness in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72) seksi Letonya kД±zlarД±, gender (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: step 1.32-dos.91), which have an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), having fun with Facebook (OR: step one.53; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step one.09-step one.87) and you may ages (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step one.66) have been notably about wedding within the third-party forwarding.
From the “finding thru an intermediary” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), that have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step 1.7step 1; 95% CI: step one.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step one.41; 95% CI: step 1.step one1-step one.80) and you may ages (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step 1.49) was indeed notably associated with engagement inside getting thru a mediator.
Intercourse variations
The regression habits had been tall. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is .fifty for women and .41 to have boys to your “sending” model; .30 for females and you will .31 having guys on the “receiving” model; .18 for females and you can .twenty-four having boys into “third-party forwarding” model; and you may .14 for women and you can .22 to own men on “finding via a mediator” design (Desk cuatro:
On “sending” design, for women, determination so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have a romantic/intimate lover (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and you may years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: 1.17-dos.20) was in fact notably regarding delivering wedding. Getting people, these were willingness so you can sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step three.68-9.94), that have a romantic/sexual mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step one.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
On the “receiving” design, for women, determination in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), having an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step 1.13-2.33) and years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: step 1.step one7-step 1.72) were somewhat pertaining to choosing engagement. Having guys, they certainly were that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), willingness so you can sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-1.86) and you can years (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-1.38).