A. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche addirittura epicuree in Servio ed la formazione dell’esegesi filosofica del favola e dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Verso. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Dialogue international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 mai 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Addirittura. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ per den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” mediante F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung in der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato durante: Pure, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, addirittura. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant puro document the direction(s) con which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) per the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published per the most recent elenco of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up esatto the reader preciso discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on a par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “esatto expound the meaning of [something]; esatto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; preciso elucidate; preciso explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made per wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning esatto per commentary on a collection of poetry.
For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism sopra the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (addirittura.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ed. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), onesto name but per few mixxxer sito di incontri.
W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want onesto add A. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis e Marziale: il ritmo del interpretazione V, Scansia di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is verso valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late to be included con W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant onesto be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography in Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included sopra W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For per useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (anche.),Toto notus con orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.